Sectrio

Cyber Security

OT Security policy - Blog

Developing customized OT security policy in complex industrial environments 

Explore Sectrio’s solutions today: Solutions | Products | Services | SOC For most Operational Technology (OT) operators, an IT security policy is often the default policy instrument for ICS security. The IT security policy is even relied upon for complex OT systems including remote sites.   This brings forth a clear mismatch between OT security priorities and IT security intricacies, leading to large gaps in the enterprise security posture.   Why should one have a separate OT security policy?  The inherent architecture of OT systems and the critical role it plays in running businesses and critical infrastructure should be sufficient for OT operators to develop and deploy specific policies for OT security. That is however not the case.   Most businesses we have been speaking to do not have a security policy that is specific to OT and considers the unique needs of OT security.   In fact, even the IT security policies that we have encountered have not been modified by businesses in any way to account for OT systems, devices, and network specifics.    Having a separate OT security and governance policy also helps with:  Organizations that have an OT security policy in place are less susceptible to cyberattacks if the policy prescriptions are adhered to with diligence and sincerity. Often, organizations with a comprehensive OT security policy in place are seen to have a more robust approach to cybersecurity.   When policies are deployed with strong interventions including ICS security solutions, practices, and training, each intervention acts as a force multiplier for the overall enterprise security posture.   Practices such as secure remote access, micro-segmentation, building DMZs, and layered security (defense-in-depth) are all the outcomes of policy guidance.    In enterprises that do not have an OT security policy, security measures are deployed in a piecemeal manner and are often a result of reactive rather than proactive inclinations.   In such entities, a compliance mandate could also drive security measures but only to the extent that the mandate prescribes.   There is usually no inclination to go beyond and explore new territories and methods for improving security.   Cost benefits  of having an OT Security Policy Having a policy for OT security also proves to be cost-effective in the long run. This is because an entity that has a comprehensive OT security policy in place doesn’t have to worry about new compliance mandates or threats and may already be compliant with standards such as IEC 62443 whose variants are being incorporated in national mandates on OT cybersecurity.   Since the entity has implemented the policy suggestions in a timebound manner, it has been able to do so in a more cost-sensitive manner without having to resort to affording a single outgo of a significant amount.   Further, by avoiding the downtimes caused by cyber incidents and poor response to incidents, OT security policy-driven businesses can save even more. They are also able to present a higher level of credibility to their customers, shareholders, and to all stakeholders thanks to the adoption of a more responsible approach to cybersecurity.   All this adds up to significant value addition to the business when one considers the long run.   Getting started with an OT security policy   If your business has a governance, risk, and compliance program, then you can build on that by engaging a mature ICS vendor who can draft an OT security policy for you.   In case you don’t have a GRC policy then we recommend you start with an ICS risk and gap assessment to identify the parameters for framing the policy.   Sectrio has enabled many enterprises in the manufacturing, oil and gas, maritime, and other sectors to frame a comprehensive OT/ICS security policy for their operations.   We can also modify your existing OT/ICS policy to ensure relevance and better implementation. From pre-policy framing exercises to monitoring the implementation and effectiveness with the right KPIs and outcomes, we can help you derive and deploy the right OT/ICS security policy. Our policy development practice team is at hand to help.   Book a consultation with our OT/ICS Policy and Governance Expert now. Contact Us  Thinking of an ICS security training program for your employees? Talk to us for a custom package.   

Developing customized OT security policy in complex industrial environments  Read More »

Oil & Gas Sector Addressing the key OTICS and IoT Security challenges

Addressing the key OT/ICS and IoT cybersecurity challenges in the oil and gas industry 

An industry veteran brought out an interesting point at a recently concluded cybersecurity conference. As per him, cybersecurity in the oil and gas industry across upstream, midstream and downstream segments involved a complex play of OEM priorities, asset and site complexities, varying plant specificities, and employee awareness levels. Despite being labeled as critical infrastructure in many countries, as per him, many sector participants were yet to realize the gravity of the consequences arising from deploying adequate cybersecurity levels.   As an industry, the oil and gas sector does face some unique challenges. Beyond everything that is known, certain practices are yet to face security scrutiny. These include reliance on cybersecurity tactics that are IT-focused and miss out on security for Operational Technology/Industrial Control System security altogether. Explore Sectrio’s solutions today: Solutions | Products | Services | SOC The lack of an institutionally embedded approach for OT security that informs all aspects of operations is another challenge that merits mention.   As per Sectrio’s threat research team, oil and gas sector entities lost over 7 TB in data in the first 5 months of the calendar year 2024 to cyberattacks. These include attacks traced back to APT groups and sophisticated threat actors.   Key security challenges in the oil and gas sector   How can oil and gas industry sector entities manage their cybersecurity priorities better?  The path to cyber maturity in the oil and gas sector is a journey and needs to pass through the following milestones:   Where can the Oil and Gas Sectrio start?  No matter where your oil and gas firm is in the cybersecurity level or maturity, an IEC 62443 and NIST CSF based ICS risk and gap assessment can help you plan your journey. Not only does such an assessment expose gaps it also outlines residual risks that can be matched with risk tolerance/appetite to ensure risks are well within acceptable limits.   All measures that are recommended after an IEC 62443-based risk assessment should be implemented in letter and spirit to ensure that every security gap is addressed.   Once the gaps are addressed, a security operations center can be established to ensure the institutionalization and replication of ICS security measures. This will also ensure the propagation of security best practices and prevent the erosion of such knowledge over a period of time.   Talk to Sectrio to secure your oil and gas infrastructure   Sectrio is working with leading oil and gas companies to secure their ICS infrastructure. In addition to solutions and SOC for securing ICS infrastructure, we can also conduct cyber risk and gap assessment exercises to identify and address the security gaps as per IEC 62443.    Thinking of an ICS security training program for your employees? Talk to us for a custom package.   

Addressing the key OT/ICS and IoT cybersecurity challenges in the oil and gas industry  Read More »

a purple and white background with a purple sphere

Phantom OT is the number one threat to industrial security  

What is phantom OT?   Phantom OT comprises systems that operate without any policy, security, or governance controls within an enterprise. They are either outside the realm of any security intervention or are deliberately overlooked in terms of security measures and policy recommendations because:  An AI-Generated tool paints an apt representation of a phantom OT system Security challenges associated with Phantom OT  Phantom OT can have multiple security and operational implications for ICS asset owners. It also opens up a gap in compliance with IEC 62443 specifically vis-à-vis  IEC 62443 2-1 outlining the requirements for an Industrial Automation Control System (IACS) security program. It can also hamper the validation of organizational security measures while lowering the accuracy of reassessments done to measure the impact of organizational and technical security measures.   “If the organization has conducted an ICS risk and gap assessment but has not identified Phantom OT for remediation, there is a strong possibility that the assessment was not performed in accordance with the requirements outlined in IEC 62443-3-2.”  The security gaps arising from Phantom OT also bring forth issues related to ownership of these assets and the infrastructure.  Overall, it renders the infrastructure vulnerable to attacks, breaches, and rogue insider activity.    As the rest of the enterprise moves on, such assets could theoretically be stuck in a time warp and exist as silos within the larger infrastructure. This presents challenges in terms of security and operations and if not addressed, can pose a much bigger security and disruption risk to the enterprise. Read More: How to get started with OT security   Phantom OT is not a mere symptom of bad governance and security practices. Instead, it represents challenges in adopting security measures at a granular level. Phantom OT also opens gaps that grow with the passage of time and allow threats to move across converged environments to target more complex systems upstream or downstream.    Threats from Phantom OT   How to deal with Phantom OT  Developing a deeper understanding of the asset landscape is a good place to implement a strategy to deal with Phantom OT. By identifying the presence of and the practices that lead to the establishment of Phantom OT, an enterprise can address the security challenge.   Other steps to deal with Phantom OT include:  To learn more about better asset management strategies and IEC 62443-based security practices and compliance measures, get in touch with us for a free no-obligation consultation.   Thinking of a ICS security training program for your employees? Talk to us for a custom package.   

Phantom OT is the number one threat to industrial security   Read More »

The Essentials Industrial Risk Assessment and Gap ANALYSIS

Risk Assessment and Gap Analysis for Industrial Control System infrastructure: the core essentials  

Conducting a risk assessment and gap analysis exercise for Industrial Control System environments is important from cybersecurity, business continuity, and risk mitigation perspectives. It is important to bring the risk exposure down to acceptable levels and minimize the risk tolerance with every assessment cycle so that the overall risk sensitivity of the enterprise improves measurably.   Where to start your Risk Assessment & Gap Analysis journey? What is the best time to start an assessment? As a matter of practice, there shouldn’t be a gap of more than 300 days between every OT/ICS & IoT risk assessment and gap analysis cycle.  If 300 days have passed since you conducted your last ICS risk assessment cycle, then an assessment is due right now. A gap of 300 days gives your security team enough time to address the gaps identified in the last round and gives you sufficient time to plan the next assessment with your OT/ICS & IoT risk assessment and gap analysis vendor.   Such a time frame also overlaps between multiple procurement cycles so that the maximum number of new assets are considered and are covered in an assessment.   Planning an assessment is not just about bringing the plant and other stakeholders on board to derive a schedule. Instead, an OT/ICS & IoT risk assessment and gap analysis planning exercise should ideally have the following: Planning an OT/ICS and IoT Risk Assessment and Gap Analysis An example from our experience of conducting OT/ICS and IoT Risk Assessment and Gap Analysis In one of the OT/ICS risk assessment and gap analysis projects that Sectrio did recently, we covered an asset base that was spread across over 994 miles (1600 km). In this project, the planning phase itself stretched over 38 days as we had to also study the report submitted by another vendor during a previous assessment. Further, our pre-assessment teams also visited multiple sites to get a first-hand view of the infrastructure along with site-specific challenges/considerations.   Other considerations while planning a Risk Assessment and Gap Analysis:  Focus areas for the pre-assessment phase    The initial/ pre-assessment steps should ideally set the stage for a more comprehensive and relevant assessment exercise. However, the initial assessment should be seen not merely as an enabler for the next assessment. The initial assessment has legs of its own to stand on and if done right, the gaps identified in this assessment can be addressed as action items on their own.   The following should be the focus areas for the pre-assessment phase:  Simplifying the approach to OT/ICS and IoT Risk Assessment & Gap Analysis Considerations for an On-site Risk Assessment and Gap Analysis Things to watch out for A less than diligent and studied assessment effort can tick a checklist line item but can never lead to any substantial change in the security posture of any organization.   Sectrio has engaged many enterprises where someone else had conducted the assessment but the findings were of no use to the teams or to the business. So how do you protect your business from unhelpful assessments? Here’s how:  When done well, an OT/ICS & IoT Risk Assessment and Gap Analysis Exercise can turn into a helpful ally to improve your security posture.   Sectrio can help you with an OT/ICS and IoT Risk Assessment and Gap Analysis Sectrio has extensive experience in securing enterprises across the globe using proprietary Risk Assessment and Gap analysis methodologies aligned with IEC 62443 and NIST CSF. Our assessments are decision-oriented and provide a complete picture of your security level along with clear measures to improve security levels and address any compliance mandate or security concern.   Talk to us today for more.  Contact us | Request for a quotation

Risk Assessment and Gap Analysis for Industrial Control System infrastructure: the core essentials   Read More »

a large industrial building with pipes and a man walking

Leveraging OT Asset Inventory for Operational Excellence: The Benefits

In this gripping growth of the industrial landscape, the need for a structured asset management system is more paramount than ever. To support this urgency OT asset inventory- a mutational tool is considered one of the best redefinitions for overseeing organization and industrial critical infrastructure. Before signing in for the OT asset inventory process, it is predominant to understand what exactly it is. Let’s examine the meticulous benefit that your business will gain from OT asset inventory management. Enhanced Visibility and Control A complete OT asset inventory appraises your asset management understanding for industrial growth in the following areas: Compliance management Following the complexities of the industry regulation can be challenging, but a well-structured OT asset inventory provides support for compliance management and reduces the risk by navigating through these: Decision-making Data-driven decision-making helps in achieving operational success in an industrial environment. Some of the areas that OT asset management uncovers for better decision-making: Cost-effective When a distorted approach is used in asset management most of the cost cannot be explained. With OT asset management, not only gets answers to the cost incurred but also ensures it is done rightly. The optimization is provided in the following areas: Conclusion The complex landscape of industries can be tackled well with the OT asset inventory tool. The delivered results and optimized growth are highly evident in the decision-making of asset inventory management. Ensure your organization is structured, adheres to compliance and always stays within the budget with the help of Sectrio’s advanced asset management solution. Connect with our team and get solutions for operational excellence.  

Leveraging OT Asset Inventory for Operational Excellence: The Benefits Read More »

a network connection with white text

OT Network Security Challenges and Expert Diagnosis

To manage the network complexities, the issues must be addressed promptly to uphold the network security challenges. These complexities outgrow the tenderness of the situation and make the network inefficient. With this solution article, identify and address OT network security challenges. Resolve it with the help of experts and ensure secure, efficient operations. Common OT Network Issues Connectivity Problems Hardware failure, misconfigured settings, and interference cause connectivity issues in an OT. Dropped connections, critical devices accessing problems, and broken communication will be the stumbling block for the unit. Regular monitoring and troubleshooting of physical connections will verify the network and align it right with the intended functions. Performance Shrink The performance will whack when the network gets congested, has low bandwidth, and runs on outdated hardware. It impacts data processing and leads to slower response time. Here, monitoring tools will help to find pinpoint areas for optimizing network performance and hardware upgrades. Security Security level drops when the OT network is exposed to cyberattacks, data breaches, ransomware, and other unethical activities. A system having outdated software, inefficient firewall security, and weak network access will invite these system insecurities.  Chalk down these vulnerabilities and implement sound security measures at each step to mitigate the security loss. Preparing the Diagnosis Network document collection Before treating any network issues, it is smart to collect detailed network documentation. This set of documentation includes device inventories, network diagrams, logs, and configuration files which will help you understand the network architecture, potential faulty areas, and changes required. Gathering Tools Effective resolution requires a set of right tools that includes packet sniffers, performance monitoring tools, and network analyzers. With these right tools problems like network issues and connectivity problems can be resolved.  Diagnosis Process Step Identifying the problem To diagnose it is important to know about the symptoms that the OT network detected. It can be slow network speed, unusual behavior in networked devices, and frequent disconnections. The team will accurately document the problem area and start interviewing the users, checking performance metrics and logs. Isolating the area After finding the problem area, the ideal step would be isolating the problem area by narrowing down the issues to specific components like routers, endpoints, and switches. Now, the team will follow the process of segmenting the network and testing individual components to find the faulty area. Testing each component This will facilitate checking the function of individual devices, cables, and connections. The tests like traceroutes, ping test, and throughput will be started. It will help in understanding faulty hardware or misconfigured settings. Analysis After completion of the above three steps, the team will analyze the collected data to find anomalies. They will review performance metrics, diagnosis tests, and error logs. Here data analysis helps in understanding the base of the issue and resolution strategy. Advanced Diagnosis Technique Network Traffic Analysis This process scrutinizes the small section of data, often known as data packets. It analyses network irregularities, and security threats by using robust tools like deep packet inspection software, packet sniffers, and network analyzers.  Post analysis, network administrators obtain thorough insight into the traffic patterns, latency, potential congestion points, and network bandwidth usage. Deep analysis is important to figure out issues like excessive unwanted traffic that can slow the system, unauthorized access, and issues like network congestion. Close monitoring of data flow in the system will help in gaining targeted intervention data and optimize security. Device-specific diagnosis It is a focused examination of single network components like firewalls, routers, switches, and controllers. Every device within an OT network will be diagnosed with the tools and procedure. These tools are often provided by the device manufacturer.  This device-oriented process will pinpoint exact problems that might not come under the radar of general network analysis. It resolves device-specific problems and contributes to the long-term stability of the entire network.  Resolving Identified Issues Quick fixes The quick fix process includes adjusting configurations, rebooting devices, and replacing faulty cables. These fixed processes close minor problems and make the system functionally available.  However, it is crucial to know that a quick fix resolves the base issue of the problem, not alleviates symptoms. With regular maintenance, the department can stop these recurring problems and improve overall network quality. Expert help The situation of the network can persist even after troubleshooting efforts. In such a case it is best to go for expert help. Some advanced problems like second-level security breaches and performance issues require advanced support and diagnostic tools. A network security expert will provide the right and effective support here through their standard troubleshooting method. Preventive Measures Network Maintenance Disciplined maintenance of the network prevents issues from build-up and ensures the performance is optimal. Disciplined maintenance includes software updates, resolving vulnerabilities, and cleaning unrequired hardware parts. Schedule your maintenance to identify the problems before they ladder up. Furthermore, a routine checkup of all the physical components keeps the exploitation on notice. Implementation of the Monitoring system A sound and effective monitoring system needs real-time tracking of security and network performance. These monitoring tools analyze anomalies, hindrances in performance, and security threats. The tools provide immediate responses to potential issues where you can set up alerts, review logs, and analyze trends.  With the maintenance of monitoring tools, departments get a proactive chance to address irregularities and make the environment for assets healthy and operational. Conclusion A well-functioning OT network ensures uninterrupted industrial operations. With regular diagnosis, these network issues can be prevented thereby saving significant time and money. Here a proactive approach is essential to repair the minor issue before it goes to the next level. For securing the network and optimizing it, considering an expert is a time-saving move. Partner with Sectrio and enhance the reliability of your network. 

OT Network Security Challenges and Expert Diagnosis Read More »

OT_ICS and IoT Incident Response Plan

OT/ICS and IoT Incident Response Plan

What is an Incident Response Plan? A network security breach can put an enterprise into chaos. A security breach exposing sensitive data and networks pushes security teams into panic, especially the inexperienced ones. Even an expert security team might fail in neutralizing a threat optimally if they are unprepared. To ensure optimal handling of threats even in crunch situations, irrespective of the teams’ experience, the Incident Response Plan (IRP) comes in handy. An Incident Response Plan is a document that assists IT and OT security professionals in responding effectively and timely to cyberattacks. The IRP plan includes details, procedures, and tools for identifying, and detecting an attack/malfunction, analyzing, determining its severity, and mitigating, eliminating, and restoring operations to normalcy on IT, IIoT, and OT networks. The IRP plays a crucial role in ensuring an attack does not recur. The amalgamation of IT, IIoT, and OT networks has made cyberattacks at the core of security breaches, along with other challenges like modification to control systems, and restricting interface with operational systems among others. Attacks on IT, IIoT, and OT Networks: Cyberattacks: The cyberattacks can originate in the following manner, targeting the corporate and operational divisions of an enterprise: Modification to control systems: From disabling safety sensors to triggering a reaction of event failures, modification to control systems can have drastic effects. The case is worse in the case of OT networks, where there is little to no security with a single event capable of impacting the whole supply chain ecosystem. The physical infrastructure at manufacturing plants comprises thousands of PLCs, multi-layered SCADA systems, and DCS. Any process malfunctioning and anomalies occurring at the plant level can affect the OT infrastructure. The following signs raise red flags about malfunction or an attack on an OT network: It is crucial to acknowledge that threats can take any form and shape, and a comprehensive IRP should be able to address the challenges above thoroughly. There have been numerous instances of a cyberattack-led attack destroying OT networks and affecting related infrastructure. IRP reflects an organization’s personal and corporate information integrity. Often, many IRPs include defining roles and responsibilities, establishing communication channels between teams (IR team and the organization), and carrying out standard protocols during a security event. An Incident Response Plan continues functioning even after handling a security event effectively. It provides a window into historical data, helping auditors ascertain the risk assessment process. Evaluating the effectiveness of IRP A set of metrics need to be established to track the effectiveness of an IRP. A few of the metrics are as follows: These metrics help understand and estimate the risk weighing on the IRP and pave the way to improve it further. Importance of Incident Response Plans in IT, IoT, & OT establishments Technology and automation are woven into our daily lives. Industrial plants run on integrated and sensitive IT and OT networks, pushing the world forward. However, the evolution of IIoT has added another layer of complexity, calling for stricter security measures, given its level of social, government, and military penetration. Need for Incident Response Plan in IoT & OT A security event has the muscle to the shake foundations of businesses. The highly publicized 2015 Target data breach saw the CEO getting fired. In addition, numerous SMBs (Small and Medium Businesses) went bankrupt after a data breach was made public. Unauthorized access hampers an enterprise’s IT ecosystem and affects every device on the network, putting thousands of IoT connected to the breached IT network. It is not possible to completely secure a given IT & OT network from cyberattacks. In such an atmosphere, IRP can help minimize the damage to a good extent. It minimizes the threat radius and can help recover the systems at a swift pace. Alongside this, it plays a crucial role in meeting numerous industry and government compliances, protecting the company’s brand, and paving the way for agencies to better collaborate in tackling the threats. Need for Incident Response Plan in the OT Sector A robust Incident Response Plan in manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, and energy sectors where IoT, IIoT, OT, ICS, and SCADA systems are vital is indispensable. OT networks are the backbone of modern society, and any lapse in their functioning can have cascading effects. Given the quantum of resources (human and other assets) and the inter-dependency of additional infrastructure in OT networks, the stakes are quite high. Hence, it is important to understand why IRP plays a key role in defining the security of IIoT and OT, thereby shaping society. The past learnings are incorporated into the IRPs, making them dynamic and living processes. By having an incident response plan, organizations can learn from past incidents, conduct post-incident analyses, and continuously improve their security posture to protect their systems and assets better. Drafting an efficient Incident Response Policy for OT, IoT, and IT Networks Irrespective of the size of the enterprise, an effective Incident Response Policy is the need of the hour amid the snowballing cybersecurity threats. A comprehensive and efficient IRP helps respond to a cybersecurity incident, malfunction, or any mishap during the operational course effectively and minimize the consequential situation arising. Therefore, following strict measures while drafting an efficient Incident Response Policy is obligatory. Break down of NIST CS IR Team Incident Response Plan – OT & IT Infrastructure The Incident Handling Guide from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) proposes a four-section phase for a successful IPR. It involves: Preparation phase: The initial phase of the Incident Response Plan deals with the prevention of threats arising from various reasons and causes. At this phase, most threats are flagged, dealt with, and analyzed to evaluate the extent of threat they pose to the enterprise. The threats that meet specific criteria based on threat intelligence inputs and other data are notified as incidents, and a defense plan is created accordingly. The preparation phase involves the following: Detection and Analysis (and documentation): Understanding anomalies and cyber intrusion is essential in the early detection of the threat.

OT/ICS and IoT Incident Response Plan Read More »

The Importance of OT Security Training

The Importance of OT Security Training

The Need for OT Security Training The frequency and sophistication of cyberattacks targeting OT systems have increased significantly in recent years. According to CISA, the energy, manufacturing, and water sectors are particularly vulnerable due to their reliance on OT systems​​.  According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), proper training helps organizations identify vulnerabilities, implement security controls, and respond effectively to incidents (NIST Special Publication 800-82, 2015).  Notable examples include the attack on water controllers in Israel and the ransomware incident at Brunswick Corporation, which disrupted manufacturing operations. The Department of Energy (DOE) also stresses the need for ongoing education to keep pace with evolving threats in the energy sector (DOE Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model, 2022). The United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom reported the highest number of breaches, underscoring the global nature of these threats.  By investing in OT Security Training, organizations can better protect their assets, ensure operational continuity, and comply with regulatory requirements. Major Countries Affected by OT Cybersecurity Breaches in 2023 This graph represents the proportion of surveyed organizations in each country that experienced at least one OT cybersecurity breach in the past year. Reference: European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), Cybersecurity Ventures, and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) provide insights on cybersecurity challenges and responses, particularly in critical infrastructure sectors​ Impact of OT Security Breaches: Potential Consequences for Industries OT security breaches can have severe consequences for various industries, including manufacturing, energy, and transportation: These examples highlight the critical need for robust OT security measures to protect essential services and infrastructure.  Reference: Security Week , Industrial Cyber Regulatory Compliance Several regulations and standards mandate OT security training: These regulations emphasize the importance of OT security training in protecting critical infrastructure and ensuring operational resilience. Organizations must stay informed about applicable rules in their industry and region to maintain compliance and enhance their security posture. Overview of OT Security Training Programs OT security training programs are designed to equip professionals with the knowledge and skills necessary to protect critical infrastructure from cyber threats. These programs are essential for ensuring the safety and reliability of industrial systems in sectors such as manufacturing, energy, and transportation. Training Components: Key Topics Covered in OT Security Training OT security training typically includes a range of topics that are critical for safeguarding industrial control systems. Some of the key components are: Risk Assessment: Incident Response: Threat Detection: Compliance and Standards: Best Practices for OT Security: Benefits of OT Security Training OT security training offers several key benefits for organizations seeking to protect their critical infrastructure. Below are the main advantages derived from such training programs. Enhanced Knowledge and Skills: How Training Improves Understanding and Management of OT SecurityProactive Threat Management: Ability to Anticipate and Mitigate Security ThreatsCompliance and Best Practices: Ensuring Adherence to Industry Standards and RegulationsImproved Organizational Security: Overall Impact on the Security Posture of the Organization Features of a Comprehensive OT Security Training Program A comprehensive OT security training program such as Sectrio’s OT and IoT Training Services is designed to address the unique needs of various industries and equip professionals with the skills necessary to protect critical infrastructure. Below are the key features of such a program. Customized Curriculum: Designed for Specific Industry Needs and Challenges A robust OT security training program offers a customized curriculum that addresses the specific needs and challenges of different industries. This tailoring ensures that the content is relevant and practical for the participants.  For example, the training for professionals in the energy sector might focus on protecting power grids and energy management systems, while training for manufacturing might emphasize securing production lines and supply chain systems. Customization ensures that participants gain knowledge and skills directly applicable to their work environment. Hands-on Learning: Practical Exercises and Real-world Scenarios Hands-on learning is a critical component of effective OT security training. Practical exercises and real-world scenarios allow participants to apply theoretical knowledge in a controlled environment.  This approach helps them understand the practical aspects of OT security, such as identifying and mitigating risks, responding to incidents, and implementing security measures. By engaging in hands-on activities, participants can better retain information and develop the confidence needed to manage OT security in their organizations. Expert Instructors: Learning from Experienced Professionals in the Field The quality of instruction is crucial in any training program. Comprehensive OT security training is delivered by expert instructors who have extensive experience in the field. These professionals bring valuable insights and real-world expertise to the training, providing participants with a deep understanding of OT security challenges and best practices.  Continuous Learning: Opportunities for Ongoing Education and Certification.OT security is an ever-evolving field, and continuous learning is essential for staying current with the latest threats and technologies. A comprehensive training program offers opportunities for ongoing education, such as advanced courses, workshops, and seminars. Additionally, certification programs validate the participants’ skills and knowledge, providing them with recognized credentials that enhance their professional development. How to Get Started with OT Security Training As said earlier, OT security training is essential for protecting critical infrastructure from cyber threats. Here’s how to get started with OT security training, including choosing the right program, getting stakeholder buy-in, and implementing the training effectively. Choosing the Right Program Factors to Consider When Selecting a Training Provider When selecting an OT security training provider, it’s important to consider several factors to ensure the program meets your organization’s needs: Getting Buy-In: Strategies to Convince Stakeholders of the Importance of OT Security Training Securing stakeholder buy-in is crucial for the successful implementation of OT security training. Here are some strategies to convince stakeholders: Implementing Training: Steps to Integrate Training into Your Organization’s Security Strategy Once you have selected a training program and secured stakeholder buy-in, follow these steps to integrate the training into your organization’s security strategy: By carefully choosing the right program, convincing stakeholders of its importance, and effectively implementing the training, your organization can significantly enhance its OT security and better protect its critical infrastructure from cyber

The Importance of OT Security Training Read More »

Sectrio - Featured Image

Gearing Up for a New Challenge: OT & IoT Security in the Automotive Industry

The automobile industry is increasingly becoming a target for cyber-attacks as vehicles evolve into sophisticated, connected systems. This transformation introduces vulnerabilities at multiple levels, from manufacturing processes to the vehicles themselves. Cyber threats in this sector can disrupt production lines, compromise sensitive data, and even endanger public safety through attacks on vehicle control systems. This abstract explores the nature of these threats, including ransomware, data breaches, and vehicle hacking. It highlights the importance of robust cybersecurity measures and industry-wide collaboration to safeguard against these evolving risks. Emphasizing the critical need for enhanced cybersecurity protocols, this study calls for continuous vigilance and adaptive strategies to protect the automotive industry’s integrity and ensure the safety of its products. The Rising Threat: Cyber Attacks on the Automobile Industry The automobile industry is no exception in an era where technology drives innovation across all sectors. Modern vehicles are increasingly becoming computers on wheels, integrating advanced software systems, connectivity, and automation to enhance user experience, safety, and efficiency. However, this digital transformation also opens new avenues for cyber threats. This blog explores the nature of cyber-attacks on the automobile industry, their implications, and the measures being taken to mitigate these risks. Cyber-attacks on the automotive industry can take many forms, from hacking into vehicle systems to targeting manufacturing processes and supply chains. These attacks can lead to severe consequences, including the theft of sensitive data, disruption of operations, and even compromising the safety of the vehicles. How IT-OT cyber-attacks in automobile industries have been increased in the last 5 years? Fig: 1 shows the approx. number of cyber-attacks attacked occurred and increased in automobile industries. Recent cyber attacks How Tesla thwarted ransomware attacks Attackers identified an unprotected Kubernetes console belonging to Tesla, The Kubernetes console was not password-protected, which allowed the attackers to gain unauthorized access. This lack of security is a critical misconfiguration, as it provides a gateway to sensitive internal systems. Once inside the Kubernetes environment, the attackers deployed containers designed to mine cryptocurrency. To avoid detection, the attackers configured the mining software to use a minimal amount of CPU power, ensuring that the spike in resource usage was not easily noticeable and they used techniques to obfuscate the network traffic, making it difficult for Tesla’s security systems to detect the malicious activity. Similarly, if attackers gain access to the IT side of an OT company, they can launch attacks on the OT side by moving laterally within the network. This type of lateral movement allows attackers to penetrate deeper into the organization’s infrastructure, compromising operational technology systems and potentially causing significant disruption. Sign up for a risk assessment today: Contact Sectrio Another example from Tesla thwarts ransomware attempt 2020, where a Russian threat actor named “Egor Igorevich Kriuchkov” tried attacking Tesla by using social engineering method where the attacker offered to bribe the employee with $1 million to install malware on Tesla’s network, The malware was intended to provide remote access to the attackers, allowing them to deploy ransomware, employee inserting a USB drive containing the malware into Tesla’s internal network or executing a malicious email attachment. The malware was designed to establish a backdoor, enabling the attackers to exfiltrate sensitive data and encrypt critical systems with ransomware. Before deploying ransomware, the attackers planned to exfiltrate large amounts of sensitive data as leverage to ensure Tesla would pay the ransom and once data exfiltration was complete, the ransomware would encrypt Tesla’s critical systems, causing significant disruption to operations.Based on our current research we have observed that the attacks on the automobile industry have drastically increased in recent years, Let’s understand the threat increasing the Automobile sector in more detail by seeing the output of the attacks received on our Automotive honeypot lab, dark web analyze and some open-source intelligence research. Sectrio’s honeypot network in the Automobile Industries In the heart of an automotive manufacturing facility, where precision and innovation drive the production line, lies a hidden gem—a meticulously crafted honeypot designed to lure cyber attackers. This honeypot, camouflaged within the network, mimics the complex IT and OT environment of the automotive industry, silently waiting to detect and analyze malicious activities. The Genesis of the Honeypot Our journey began with a clear objective to understand the ongoing cyber-attacks targeting the Automobile industry and to enhance security. We have designed our OT honeypot architecture to monitor and analyze the new and possible types of attacks on automotive industries, complete with both IT and OT components. Our Automobile honeypot is segmented into the IT Network, OT Network, and the DNZ zone. IT Networks consist of different servers, Endpoint workstations, and other Networking devices. OT Network consists of PLCs, RTUs, SCADA systems, HMIs, CNC machines, CAN Bus Networks, MES, etc. All the traffic coming to this honeypot is captured and monitored to identify attacks and enhance the detection power of the Section’s Operational technology Intrusion detection system in the Automobile industry. The chances of attackers targeting the OT systems of automobile industries are increasing day to day and after in-depth research and analysis from our honeypot traffic, Dark web, and some OSINT we have observed that Ransomware attacks are more commonly happening in the automotive industry. Let’s understand some attacks from our honeypot lab with an example, a)    Manipulating the CAN Bus The first sign was seen when our OT Intrusion Detection system flagged an anomaly on the CAN bus network, the backbone of communication within vehicles and a popular communication standard in the automobile sector, It helps in communication between different electronic control units. The Electronic Control Unit (ECU) is responsible for processes in a car, which includes the break, engines, airbags, etc. The ECUs can communicate with the help of the CAN protocol. An attacker had injected false messages, attempting to manipulate the signals controlling the robotic assembly arms. This attack aimed to disrupt the precise coordination required for assembling vehicle components. Due to the honeypot environment, the attack was within the simulated environment allowing us to research and analyze the attack

Gearing Up for a New Challenge: OT & IoT Security in the Automotive Industry Read More »

a water with a bridge and buildings in the background

Fuxnet: the Industrial Control System Malware

Fuxnet Malware  Fuxnet is a piece of industrial control system (ICS) malware recently used by the Ukrainian hacking group Blackjack against Russian infrastructure. This malware is designed to target sensor gateways and cause significant disruption to industrial systems.  Fuxnet represents a significant leap in the capabilities of malware designed to disrupt industrial control systems (ICS). Unlike traditional cyber threats that primarily focus on data theft or network disruption, it is engineered to cause physical damage and operational paralysis in critical infrastructure. Its deployment against Russian underground infrastructure has already led to widespread disruptions, showcasing its destructive potential.  Who is Blackjack?  The Blackjack hacker group has emerged as a significant cyber threat, employing sophisticated strategies to target prominent organizations throughout Russia. Through a series of carefully planned attacks, Blackjack has caused widespread disruption, impacting government agencies, critical infrastructure providers, and major corporations.  Figure 1: Blackjack Hacker Group  Timeline of Blackjack Hacker Group’s Attacks  In November 2023, the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation became a victim of Blackjack’s cyber campaign. The group successfully breached the ministry’s security measures, gaining unauthorized access to a vast array of sensitive documents. Among the compromised data were statistics related to the “SVO”,  as well as personal information belonging to military personnel. Additionally, reports intended for the President of Russia were compromised in this breach. The incursion raised serious concerns about national security and highlighted the vulnerabilities present within government institutions.  The following month, Rosvodokanal, a crucial water utility company serving millions of Russians, found itself targeted by Blackjack. The hackers launched a highly damaging assault, compromising the security of over 6,000 computers within the company’s network. As a result, more than 50 terabytes of critical data were erased, dealing a significant blow to the infrastructure of the nation. This attack disrupted essential services and underscored the audacious nature and extensive capabilities of the Blackjack group.  In subsequent attacks, Blackjack continued to demonstrate its proficiency in cyber warfare. In January 2024, the group targeted M9 Telecom, a prominent Russian Internet Service Provider (ISP). Utilizing their expertise, the hackers successfully deleted 20 terabytes of data from M9 Telecom’s systems, causing internet outages for numerous residents in Moscow.   Shortly thereafter, Blackjack set its sights on a Russian state enterprise involved in construction projects for the president’s military initiatives. The group’s infiltration efforts yielded over 1.2 terabytes of classified data, including maps detailing more than 500 military bases across Russia and regions in Ukraine under Russian control. The stolen information was subsequently transmitted to Ukraine’s Security and Defense Forces, prompting concerns about international security and diplomatic tensions.  Download Sectrio’s 2024 global threat landscape assessment and analysis report.  As the months progressed, Blackjack’s attacks intensified, targeting critical infrastructure and strategic assets. In April 2024, the group launched a devastating assault on OwenCloud.ru, a data centre utilized by Russia’s military, energy, and telecommunications sectors. The attack resulted in the destruction of 300 terabytes of data stored across 400 virtual and 42 physical servers, severely impacting Russia’s operational capabilities.   Moscollector, a vital Moscow-based company responsible for constructing and managing underground water, sewage, and communications infrastructure, fell victim to Blackjack’s malicious activities. By deploying the destructive malware Fuxnet, the group disabled 87,000 sensors and control systems (OT and ICS systems), disrupting essential services and causing widespread chaos.   In each instance, Blackjack demonstrated its proficiency in executing coordinated cyberattacks, targeting key entities, and exploiting vulnerabilities within their systems. The group’s actions have underscored the critical importance of bolstering cybersecurity measures and enhancing resilience against evolving threats in the digital age. As authorities continue to grapple with the challenges posed by Blackjack and similar cybercriminal organizations, vigilance and collaboration remain paramount in safeguarding against future attacks and mitigating their potential impact on society.  Date  Target  Damage  Nov 29, 2023  Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation  Blackjack gains access to sensitive documents including statistics on “SVO,” personal data of military personnel, reports to the President of Russia, and certificates of the number of prosthetics.  Dec 20, 2023  Rosvodokanal, a Russian water utility company  Blackjack attacks over 6,000 computers, deleting more than 50 terabytes of data, and compromising internal documents, correspondence, cyber protection services, and backups.  Jan 10, 2024  M9 Telecom, Russian ISP  Blackjack deletes 20 terabytes of data, disrupting internet services for Moscow residents.  Jan 19, 2024  Russian state enterprise involved in construction work for the President’s military  Blackjack obtains over 1.2 terabytes of classified data, including maps of Russian military bases, and transfers it to Ukrainian Security and Defense Forces, disabling 150 computers.  Apr 08, 2024  OwenCloud.ru data centre, used by the Russian military, energy, and telecommunications industries  Blackjack destroys 300 terabytes of data on 400 virtual and 42 physical servers, crippling Russia’s operational capabilities.  Apr 15, 2024  Moscollector, a Moscow-based infrastructure company  Blackjack disables 87,000 sensors and controls, including those in airports, subways, and gas pipelines. Fuxnet deployed to physically destroy sensory equipment.  Floods RS485serial communications M-Bus, sending random commands to embedded control systems.  All servers and routers are wiped, and access to the office building is disabled. Blackjack defaces the Moscollector webpage. 1,700 sensor routers were destroyed, and databases, backups, and email servers were wiped, totalling 30 terabytes of data.  Table 1: Timelines of Blackjack hacker group  Fuxnet Attack Path  Fuxnet malware targeted Industrial Control System (ICS) gateways, likely exploiting remote access protocols (SSH or SBK) to infiltrate Moscolector’s systems. Once inside, it escalated privileges, wiped or corrupted critical files, and disrupted communication protocols. This effectively bricked the gateways, potentially damaging connected sensors as well. While the exact number remains debated, this attack disabled hundreds or thousands of devices crucial to monitoring Moscow’s sewage system.   Figure 2: Fuxnet Attack Diagram  Initial Access  The initial point of access for Fuxnet is through RL22w 3G routers manufactured by the Russian company iRZ. These routers, which use the OpenWRT operating system, were compromised using SSH and Telnet services.  Once located, the attackers employ brute-force attacks to guess the passwords, often exploiting the fact that many devices still operate with

Fuxnet: the Industrial Control System Malware Read More »

Scroll to Top